logoalt Hacker News

15155last Monday at 12:13 PM1 replyview on HN

Because what's the point?

You're running JS (an 'interpreted', managed language) - it's already intentionally designed to be executed in a sandbox. Unless you provide hooks out to the host system, it can't do anything bad. With mquickjs, the untrusted code can't even overflow your heap or take too much execution time.

If you were running untrusted C or something, it would make more sense to add the WASM layer.


Replies

simonwlast Monday at 3:43 PM

Mainly defence in depth.

I have enormous respect for Fabrice but mquickjs is only a few weeks old and I'm no way near skilled enough to audit his C code!

Running it in WASM feels a lot safer to me.

show 1 reply