logoalt Hacker News

roncesvalleslast Tuesday at 7:49 PM1 replyview on HN

Some of it could also be a plain Darwinian numbers game. Facebook was neither the first nor the only social media of its kind. There were hundreds of failed attempts at similar social media, counting those that died in obscurity.

When Google attempted their Facebook clone, it was just one of the many who took a spin at the wheel. It was always more likely to have failed than succeeded.

Building a B2C with hysteric adoption is difficult because it's very mysterious what elements of the product will actually lead to success, because it's a psychological thing. E.g., if Facebook chose green instead of blue as their theme color (all else equal), it might've died in obscurity.


Replies

irishcoffeelast Tuesday at 8:58 PM

Pretty sure Facebook took off because they required you to have a .edu address, and even then, when it first launched it wasn’t just any .edu, the rolllout was slow. I remember people enrolling in 2-year schools when the regex matched on *.edu just so they could get an account.

Facebook hit the seam of internet 2.0: after the .com crash with a bunch of kids who grew up on AIM/ICQ/whatever and all these kids wanted to keep up with their friends at various colleges.

They indeed just got lucky.