logoalt Hacker News

Eat Real Food

1143 pointsby atestulast Wednesday at 5:22 PM1600 commentsview on HN

Comments

mnemotroniclast Thursday at 5:00 AM

Yea! Fat and red meat are back in style! And not a smidgen of talk about moderation! Woo-hoo!

This guy is my hero:https://arstechnica.com/health/2025/01/florida-man-eats-diet...

dbg31415last Wednesday at 10:56 PM

> Protein target: 1.2–1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight per day.

Since this is an official US government website, are we now officially using metric?

raybblast Thursday at 12:58 AM

Does anyone have a recommendation for a good course to take to learn the basics of nutrition. I've done some very very simple ones from my insurance company for a small incentive but looking for something more serious and rooted in current scientific consensus (which I hear is not always so clear when it comes to nutrition).

tomy0000000yesterday at 4:21 AM

This is straight up the best US government campaign website I’ve seen. Kudos to whoever made this!

opinion3klast Wednesday at 6:10 PM

it's great to recommend these things but if you're poor and live in a food desert, it doesn't address the actual issues that prevent people from eating healthier: money, living in an area where the bodega or wal-mart are your only food options, corporate interests that want us to eat ultra-processed foods, not having the time or ability to cook, and many more I'm sure.

show 2 replies
DebtDeflationlast Wednesday at 9:18 PM

Eating real foods (e.g., whole foods rather than highly processed foods) is good advice overall. But replacing mono and poly unsaturated fats with saturated fats is total nonsense. We have thousands of studies spanning decades showing that increased saturated fat consumption leads to elevated LDL-C and elevated LDL-C is causitively associated with higher rates of CVD. There's no reason to replace olive oil with butter and beef tallow.

jjoelast Wednesday at 8:51 PM

I processed the Scientific Report Appendices (PDF) through PaperSplain. I'm sharing the analysis here for those interested:

https://papersplain.com/sample/62d71c8ecb6411e042f346088c231...

ndom91last Wednesday at 6:41 PM

Well it's a next.js app that's not vulnerable to react2shell, that's at least something they've done right haha

sailfastlast Thursday at 4:52 AM

Are they going to subsidize real food also? Maybe help get people access to it?

Or just talk about how good it is while they let people subsist on the most calories they can get for their dollar?

Also - great... another website as "governance". Put out a press release - it's solved!

didibuslast Wednesday at 9:41 PM

The only change from the previous dietary recommendations that I can see is that they recommend a bit of a smaller portion of veggies and a bit of a bigger portion of protein. Everything else seems exactly the same.

Am I missing something?

It also seems like the bigger protein portion over veggies is strangely what I would expect from someone on TRT...

ramon156last Thursday at 4:56 PM

Anyone know how I can contact https://ndstudio.gov/ ? their talent form is broken

ANarrativeApelast Thursday at 5:42 AM

if everybody eats the whole foods they can afford, they will be healthier than if they eat an ultra high processed food diet.

The cost of living issue could actually work in favor of those with less money as they can afford less of the unprocessed meat and cheese, and would have to 'settle' for more lentils, frozen vegetables and other incredibly healthy and inexpensive food.

yes, I know the cultural reasons that will make this switch highly unlikely, but that is disconnected from the pyramid.

The popular takeaway from the pyramid will not result in a decrease in the popularity of takeaways, ready meals and other UHP foods.

The polarization of the debate is as unhealthy as the eating habits that desperately need changing.

show 1 reply
andyjohnson0last Wednesday at 9:15 PM

Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.

- Michael Pollan

drakythelast Wednesday at 5:40 PM

Disregarding comments on the proposed diet (as I am not qualified to comment and it all feels relatively like what I have passively absorbed over the past decade anyway):

Why, WHY, does this page act like an Apple marketing page and require so much scrolling??? Thanks. I hate it.

show 1 reply
a3wlast Thursday at 9:44 AM

How is milk considered food? Way too sweet for a diet in a rich country.

markvdblast Thursday at 2:17 PM

Why would I trust these recommendations? Much higher quality dietary information is available from much more trustworthy sources than the US government du jour.

ainiriandlast Thursday at 2:14 PM

Half the pyramid is dairy+meat, that's a pass for me. I do not eat those and my yearly health checks are as boring as a tax seminar on a Friday afternoon.

throwfaraway4last Wednesday at 5:28 PM

Makes sense. Now make protein affordable.

show 4 replies
nottorplast Thursday at 2:02 PM

Scrolling that kills my browser. I suppose the info is only for those who can afford very high end computers and thus also afford to pay for real food?

827alast Wednesday at 8:23 PM

I am positively blown away by the work National Design Studio is doing for the Federal Government.

show 2 replies
kyledrakelast Wednesday at 11:57 PM

I would love to see some evidence for the huge increase in protein on this new pyramid. I'm not challenging it, I'm genuinely curious if there's substantial evidence that a lot of it is actually good for most people.

collaborativelast Wednesday at 8:57 PM

Nothing wrong with grains as long as they aren't the processed GM'd ones you find everywhere. Bake wholegrain spelt bread at home and you can make that 70% of your diet no problem. People used to only eat bread before, they were fine

show 1 reply
cdrnsflast Wednesday at 11:41 PM

How do you build what amounts to a brochure website and send ~10MB+ over the wire?

2OEH8eoCRo0last Wednesday at 9:29 PM

Not as bad as expected. Healthy fats and whole grains with lots of fruit and vegetables. Emphasis on minimal processing.

It might even be better messaging than the healthy plate because it shows the foods visually which is what some people need to see.

doogliuslast Wednesday at 6:01 PM

I thought I recall from reading a previous 5-year one of these there being much more explicit information on ranges of micro-nutrients one should get (e.g. an explicit recommendation for how much Vitamin C to get). Is there an equivalent somewhere here?

arnejenssenlast Thursday at 7:43 AM

Fantastic. This will set America on a trajectory to prosperity

throwaway_5633last Wednesday at 11:18 PM

Sounds like meat producers may have lobbied for this, fearing the quickly diminishing costs of lab-grown meat, expect lab-grown meat to be labeled “high-processed therefor bad” as soon as it becomes widely available.

nice_bytelast Wednesday at 10:46 PM

"We're ending the war on protein"

WTF is this even referring to? literally everyone here is _obsessed_ with their protein intake, regardless of whether they're a meat-eater or not. of all the things America's at war with, protein is definitely not one of them.

cathyreisenwitzlast Wednesday at 8:12 PM

Vegs should be at the top, meat & animal products under. Still an improvement. #1 health tip for poor autists w IBS: Half a bag of frozen vegs in a bowl + splash of water. Microwave 2 min. Stir. Microwave 1 min. Salt. Eat.

doogliuslast Wednesday at 5:43 PM

The actual PDF here: https://cdn.realfood.gov/DGA.pdf once you wade through the atrocious scroll-jacking

NPC82last Thursday at 9:50 AM

Traditionally, the US Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) is actually a policy guidance document and not a marketing or handout document.

Nine pages is laughable and sad. There are entire missing sections on different life stages and transition foods. (edit: I see it now, I scrolled by it because it's way shorter than it usually is) That kind of sensitive guidance on nutrition is supposed to come from this document - which is usually 150+ pages and includes input from committees of registered dietitians.

I'm glad some people are enthusiastic to find nutritional clarity in their lives but I can't imagine this is going to be helpful for the institutions or people that usually rely on it.

Also, please remember this secretary is actively ignoring a measles outbreak, has an obsession with instagram health fads, and is a disgrace to the global scientific community.

bruceblast Wednesday at 5:37 PM

One of the dumbest, frustrating things during Obama's Administration was the partisan Republican attack on Michelle Obama's push for healthier school lunches.

Democrats should not reflexive be against this just because they don't like the current president or HHS secetry. Same thing with the restrictions on buying soda and junk food with SNAP.

The supermarket is filled with processed food. Black cat/White cat whatever catches the mouse. The push to eat real food is good. Embrace it even if you don't like people behind it.

show 2 replies
lanyard-textilelast Wednesday at 5:29 PM

And 100 years from now, will we still call it the New Pyramid? :)

I guess we still call it New York...

show 2 replies
jdoe1337halolast Wednesday at 5:34 PM

I get having issues with RFK and the way the administrations handles health issues surrounding vaccines, but this seems pretty solid.

qginlast Wednesday at 5:42 PM

Is there any evidence that what people actually eat is influenced by government guidelines? I have a hard time imagining someone seeing this and making an actual changing to their life in any way.

show 2 replies
briandolllast Thursday at 12:10 AM

Pretty rich for the administration that deregulated OSHA and massively harmed our ability to ensure food safety to tell people literally anything about food.

tekkklast Thursday at 9:13 AM

Does this mean better school lunches? With real salad and meat, not just hamburgers and ketchup. I'd hope so.

bwestergardlast Wednesday at 5:32 PM

"In February 2010, Michelle Obama launched “Let’s Move!” with a wide-ranging plan to curb childhood obesity. The campaign took aim at processed foods, flagged concerns about sugary drinks, and called for children to spend more time playing outside and less time staring at screens. The campaign was roundly skewered by conservatives... But the strategy that Kennedy’s HHS is using to address the problem so far—pressuring food companies to alter their products instead of introducing new regulations—is the same one that Obama relied on, and will likely fall short for the same reason hers did a decade ago."

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2025/09/maha-lets...

show 1 reply
mcintyre1994last Thursday at 8:22 AM

So dumb question I guess but which part of that old pyramid is supposed to be prioritising highly processed food?

show 1 reply
hopelitelast Wednesday at 11:58 PM

Something this does not actually seem to address is that even our “real food” is also polluted with massive glyphosate. And no, it is also something that is a massive problem in Europe, including meat, which does not get as regulated as vegetables and fruits, so levels can often be even higher.

This young woman did an excellent explanation of the overall state of things in a YouTube video, for anyone that wants an intro. https://youtu.be/s64PNMAK92c

sneilan1last Wednesday at 9:30 PM

I'm so confused. Why would the United States care about people's health? It feels out of character for this administration given the times.

show 1 reply
zartzurtyesterday at 3:14 AM

Did anyone notice that if you hold right or left arrow button in the last section you can see rfk jr image appearing

scwilbankslast Wednesday at 9:40 PM

The guidelines are good, but to make a real impact, we need a federally funded k-12 breakfast and lunch program that is free for all students.

dyauspitrlast Wednesday at 8:52 PM

Interesting, this is not bad at all. Maybe the only real issue is prescribing a lot of red meat which categorically isn’t that good for you.

bilsbielast Thursday at 1:30 AM

I worry this will cause people to try to treat their health problems with food instead of trusting the medical system.

throw7last Wednesday at 9:15 PM

This is a good reset. I just imagine if this was put out by a Democrat white house, the republicans would be blowing a gasket.

show 1 reply

🔗 View 50 more comments