logoalt Hacker News

opinion3klast Wednesday at 6:10 PM2 repliesview on HN

it's great to recommend these things but if you're poor and live in a food desert, it doesn't address the actual issues that prevent people from eating healthier: money, living in an area where the bodega or wal-mart are your only food options, corporate interests that want us to eat ultra-processed foods, not having the time or ability to cook, and many more I'm sure.


Replies

tracker1last Wednesday at 6:36 PM

Even questionable quality ground beef is almost always a better option than most carb-centric nutrition sources. It freezes well, transports is broadly available and can usually be ordered for delivery.

Eggs, aside from some of the disease issues are also a very good, nutritionally complete source of protein that are relatively inexpensive.

Another issue is that people have been conditioned to eat/snack all the time... a lot of people have moved towards 2-3 meals a day which is closer to historical norms... have protein be your main source, with vegetables as a side, and maybe bread/pasta at some meals.

There are also beans/legumes if you can tolerate them.

aworkslast Wednesday at 6:27 PM

I was roaming around the rural Western US last year.

If I saw that there was a Walmart in town, I perked up. Consistent, low-priced and large number of grocery items. Likely better than an unknown, variable, often poorly stocked local grocery (or worse, groceries at a gas station/convenience store).

I also liked seeing the economic diversity of customers that I wouldn't see at home.

In larger cities, I'll choose other groceries if I can for better selection, if not better prices.

Of course, except for maybe Sprouts, all the places I shop emphasize ultra-processed corporte interests.

show 1 reply