logoalt Hacker News

blitzarlast Wednesday at 5:33 PM8 repliesview on HN

It is "progress" when tech bros displace traditional workers, but it is "heartbreaking" when a tech bro gets displaced by other tech bros.

Whats the 2026 version of "you should learn to code"?


Replies

Fraterkeslast Wednesday at 6:39 PM

There’s many people who dislike both of those things. Please think before you write

toomuchtodolast Wednesday at 6:39 PM

"You should learn how to vibecode and ship whatever works enough, as fast as possible, to get bought for a wildly disconnected from fundamentals valuation." This may sound flippant, or low quality, but it I assure that it is not intended to be. It is derived from observations of the current tech macro. Quality does not appear to matter, ethics do not appear to matter, sustainability and engineering rigor do not appear to matter; it appears that all that matters is "Start up. Cash in. Sell out. Bro down."

I would love to be proven wrong, truly, because this is a path to the death of craftsmanship, deep knowledge, and to some extent, curiosity, in the domain.

show 3 replies
elictroniclast Wednesday at 5:54 PM

You should learn to vote for UBI?

show 6 replies
Rzorlast Wednesday at 9:01 PM

>Whats the 2026 version of "you should learn to code"?

Elderly care.

show 1 reply
tqilast Wednesday at 6:23 PM

When you talk in meaningless terms like "traditional workers" and "tech bros", all it tells me is that you have divided the world into people you like and people you dislike and mourn / celebrate accordingly.

show 2 replies
inchidilast Wednesday at 6:11 PM

unfortunately, it doesn't seems like tech bro gets displaced by other tech bros at all and more like corporates running costly ephemeral branding as tech bro by abusing other tech bros works.

show 1 reply
red-iron-pinelast Wednesday at 9:36 PM

[flagged]

spaceman_2020last Wednesday at 6:37 PM

Well, I never read the artcicle because paywall, but there is a WSJ headline today about a $160k mechanic job at Ford that can't be fulfilled because no labor

show 1 reply