logoalt Hacker News

daplast Wednesday at 9:17 PM2 repliesview on HN

> How long did humanity survive without vaccines for _everything_? Oh that's right.

Is this a trick question? Humanity survived by having enough people with enough other useful traits (like thinking, including the ability to reason about disease and how to prevent it) to overcome the numbers lost to disease. Humans died to disease in enormous numbers.

> nor that they're all good for _me_ as an individual.

Herd immunity presents a real challenge to idea that people should generally be allowed to make their own choices. One's choice here affects everyone else, in a minuscule way that nonetheless adds up to many thousands of lives saved. I'm not sure what the answer is for this, but generally I come down on the side of: if a democratic process creates rules requiring us all to be immunized for the common good, that's okay with me.


Replies

simianparrotlast Thursday at 8:36 AM

Herd immunity isn't on its own enough to justify coercion of medical interventions.

You might want to read up on the principle of informed consent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_ethics#Informed_consen...

> After receiving and understanding this information, the patient can then make a fully informed decision to either consent or refuse treatment.

You are overly simplifying vaccines as if they do not affect individuals individually. They absolutely do, for so many reasons, like allergies. But even if that wasn't the case, _all_ vaccines carry some risk/benefit tradeoff, and each individual is entirely in their right to weigh this for themselves.

Also did we learn nothing from covid?

themafialast Wednesday at 9:32 PM

> One's choice here affects everyone else

You still owe me a court trial if you want to act on that in a way that reduces my rights. Prove that my individual choices are affecting anyone.

> if a democratic process creates rules requiring us all to be immunized for the common good, that's okay with me.

Drinking is universally a harm. We should ban alcohol. It's for the common good, obviously, and there are zero arguments against this. Why do we allow drinking? At the very least we should ban _public_ drinking. There's no sense in socially allowing this to occur.

show 1 reply