How do I distinguish the world where institutional investors are meaningfully contributing to high housing prices and the world where they aren’t? Is there some metric you’ve seen that substantiates the mechanism? For example, are they only 1% of holders but 50% of trading volume or something?
Because if I saw a house 15% below market where I live, I would buy it (to live in). I don’t imagine I’m the only one. Institutional investors can’t stop me from doing that if it’s offered - can they stop the seller from offering that?
You're looking at the symptoms rather than the cause. Land is scarce and finite and you cannot make more of it.
You could be 50% of trading volume just by trading a small number of properties back and forth constantly! That doesn't mean anything.