logoalt Hacker News

nhumrichlast Thursday at 2:17 AM4 repliesview on HN

Might be corrupt, but is at least closer to truth then the last corrupted version. Let's not let perfect be the enemy of progress


Replies

kristopolouslast Thursday at 2:26 AM

The incentives are wrong. Any good policy for bad incentives is temporary and incidental

This policy selectively emphasizes the most difficult to import foods so it also plays into isolationist nativist policies.

If you think meat lobbying groups just wanted a new triangle and this isn't going to extend to water, land, energy, and environmental policies along with farm subsidies and even merger&acquisition and liability policies, sorry ...

This thing is for them, their profitability and their investors. They didn't lobby on behalf of your personal health...

Open a position on the MOO ETF. I just did. Might as well make some money from it

show 1 reply
didibuslast Thursday at 3:15 AM

Is it? The change in recommendation is to have less veggies in favor of more meat. From all the recent research and meta studies I've seen it doesn't track.

It's still decent a guidance, but the previous one was as well.

show 3 replies
jiballast Thursday at 11:15 AM

The last corrupted version had the same person at its head.

bilbo0slast Thursday at 3:01 AM

>but is at least closer to truth then [than?] the last corrupted version

I'm pretty sure you did the rhetorical equivalent of looking at a roomful of pregnant high school girls..

.. and declaring one of them to be closest to virginity.