I really wish people would stop sharing that article as if it means anything. Nina Teicholz is not who you should be getting your science from.
Her views are not the scientific consensus. She is not a scientist, she is a journalist with an agenda.
Fair enough! I was not aware of that. But she's far from the only one. There appears to be a wall of meta-analysis stating the same, but again, I'm naive and just googling.
Neither should we have trusted Ancel Keys, but here we are