They will directly write that "Radiologists miss nearly one-third of breast cancers."
I trust the meaning of this article is just that it requires hospitals to rethink their decision to substitute all doctors today.
If they test someone with no background in radiology, they could even make the headline "Humans miss 50% of breast cancers"
No hospital is deciding that. People have been testing whether we can replace radiologists with AI for over 10 years.