logoalt Hacker News

glensteinlast Thursday at 12:38 PM2 repliesview on HN

The phrasing strongly suggests exactly the opposite. Essentially, the whole framing of the linked guardian article is that there is a specific population which are the "disproportionate beef eaters".


Replies

jncfhnblast Thursday at 6:13 PM

The phrasing you’re looking for is that 12% of Americans consume an average of 50% of beef consumed every day.

By saying “on any given day” you are suggesting it’s a different 12%. The article does confuse this by identifying cohorts that eat more beef. But it’s a tautological label based on the survey data. They identify some correlates, like being a 50 something male. But there are males who are 50 something that don’t eat any beef. They’re not included in the 12%.

The 12% is just the outcome of the sample. It doesn’t mean they’re a consistent cohort.

Example:

* on any given day x million women give birth

* there are x million women who give birth every day

yxwvutlast Thursday at 1:33 PM

And from the study linked, that framing/suggestion would be incorrect (at least for the numbers given). "the 12% are not the same every day" is an accurate interpretation. They asked about what people ate _yesterday_...

show 1 reply