I read it. i agree this is out of touch. Not because the things its saying are wrong, but because the things its saying have been true for almost a year now. They are not "getting worse" they "have been bad". I am staggered to find this article qualifies as "news".
If you're going to write about something that's been true and discussed widely online for a year+, at least have the awareness/integrity to not brand it as "this new thing is happening".
> They are not "getting worse" they "have been bad".
The agents available in January 2025 were much much worse than the agents available in November 2025.
I mean "have been bad" doesnt exclude "getting worse" right :)
Perhaps the advertising money from the big AI money sinks is running out and we are finally seeing more AI scepticism articles.