Of wide adoption is more important than than the key benefits of strong copyleft OpenSource, then something like MIT will help, but personally I'd keep with AGPL3.
I wasn't advocating for change in my previous comments, just pointing out that a fair number of people will ask for that, and why they would. IMO "we can't use it under this license because of company policy" is a them problem, not a you problem!
alt Hacker News
Of wide adoption is more important than than the key benefits of strong copyleft OpenSource, then something like MIT will help, but personally I'd keep with AGPL3.
I wasn't advocating for change in my previous comments, just pointing out that a fair number of people will ask for that, and why they would. IMO "we can't use it under this license because of company policy" is a them problem, not a you problem!