logoalt Hacker News

FrontierProjectlast Thursday at 9:39 PM4 repliesview on HN

This site has gone full Tower of Babel. I've seen at least a thousand "AI comment" callouts on this site in the last month and at this point I'm pretty sure 99% of them are wrong.

In fact, can someone link me to a disputed comment that the consensus ends up being it's actually AI? I don't think I've seen one.


Replies

NitpickLawyerlast Thursday at 9:46 PM

You know how the chicken sexers do their thing, but can't explain it? Like they can't write a list of things they check for. And when they want to train new people they have them watch (apprentice style) the current ones, and eventually they also become good at doing it themselves?

It's basically that. I can't explain it (I tried listing the tells in a comment below), but it's not just a list of things you notice. You notice the whole message, the cadence, the phrases that "add nothing". You play with enough models, you see enough generations and you start to "see it".

If you'd like to check for yourself, check that user's comment history. It will become apparent after a few messages. They all have these tells. I don't know how else to explain it, but it's there.

show 1 reply
lpellislast Thursday at 10:32 PM

I think this might be one of the first times I didnt notice it, but just look through the comment history of https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=jackfranklyn , they all look the same.

tripdoutlast Thursday at 10:36 PM

This article reads like AI

dragonwriterlast Thursday at 9:41 PM

“Comment I don't like is a bot” is the new “Comment I don’t like is a product of the HN hivemind conspiracy”.

show 1 reply