logoalt Hacker News

FunnyUsernamelast Friday at 4:42 AM1 replyview on HN

1. It's pretty much the same - no press in dangerous areas unless invited and escorted by the military. The only major difference is that Ukraine is >1000x larger, and has safe areas far from any fighting where such press restrictions aren't needed.

2. You're making a bunch of separate accusations without connecting them to the topic at hand, which was press restrictions.


Replies

Cyph0nlast Friday at 4:49 AM

No, they’re not the same, and (2) is very relevant.

Let me reiterate: Ukraine is a sovereign nation with a sovereign military that has the ability to enforce restrictions within its own territory.

To bring your bad analogy more in line with reality on the ground, imagine if Ukraine was still part of/occupied by the USSR/Russia, and Russia enforced press restrictions across all of Ukrainian territory during a Ukrainian insurgency. However, in this theoretical USSR, Ukrainians did not get Soviet citizenship, and were under a total blockade.

> The only major difference is that Ukraine is >1000x larger, and has safe areas far from any fighting where such press restrictions aren't needed.

But Israel never allowed press into the strip, even during “ceasefire” periods - like right now! This implies that Israel is not somehow paternalistically concerned for press safety; it simply wants a media blackout.

So no, this “major difference” is irrelevant when comparing restrictions between the two conflicts.

show 1 reply