Treating share of global gdp as meaningful is bizarre. It doesn't have to be bad for your share to shrink as long as the overall pie is growing.
When we talk about that in people terms, it goes one way. But then the same people defend the same argument on a country basis?
Aren't they the same thing?
When we talk about that in people terms, it goes one way. But then the same people defend the same argument on a country basis?
Aren't they the same thing?