logoalt Hacker News

psychoslaveyesterday at 9:07 AM1 replyview on HN

>It is almost 1:1 in that you can compile WAT to Wasm and then back to WAT with barely any loss in information (you may lose variable names and some metadata).

I love it! It reads like, "you can put your snowman in a oven to obtain water and then the water to a snow machine to get to your initial material state with almost no information lost."


Replies

everfrustratedyesterday at 4:41 PM

I was reading a research paper who benchmarked some wasm compilers and the fastest was converting wasm back to c and recompiling it again!

show 1 reply