logoalt Hacker News

moltarlast Friday at 9:25 AM6 repliesview on HN

To extend your all you can eat analogy. It’s similar to how all you can eat restaurants allow you to eat all you can within the bounds of the restaurant, but you aren’t allowed to bring the food out with you.


Replies

hshdhdhj4444last Friday at 10:57 AM

Another analogy is that it’s a takeout but anthropic is insisting you only eat at home with the plastic utensils they’ve provided rather than the nice metal utensils you have at home.

Another analogy is that it’s a restaurant that offers delivery and they’re insisting you use their own in house delivery service instead of placing a pickup order and asking your friendly neighbor to pick it up for you on their way back from the office.

show 1 reply
jbstacklast Friday at 9:37 AM

It's not really a fair analogy. Restaurants don't want you taking food away because they want to limit the amount you eat to a single meal, knowing that you'll stop when you get full. If you take food out you can eat more by waiting until the next meal when you're hungry again.

You don't "get full" and "get hungry again" by switching UIs. You can consume the same amount whether you switch or you don't switch.

show 3 replies
dfabulichlast Friday at 9:39 AM

Not really. At a buffet restaurant, if you could take the food out with you, you'd takeaway more food than you can eat at one sitting. OpenCode users and Claud Code™ CLI users use tokens at approximately the same rate.

This is more like an all-you-can-eat restaurant requiring you to eat with their flimsy plastic forks, forbidding you to bring your own utensils.

show 3 replies
PunchyHamsterlast Friday at 10:46 AM

...no, that's more like "but you can't bring your own fork"

show 1 reply
darepubliclast Friday at 11:10 AM

anthropic should not be criticizing the gluttony of others whilst licking its fingers surrounded by buckets full of fried chicken