This shows that the people in charge have no idea. If they understood the topic, there would be no need for evidence.
This is exactly the kind of backwards thinking that pushes people against inquisition and consultation. They people in charge have a good idea of the playing field but it's always good to ask for input.
> the people in charge have no idea. If they understood the topic, there would be no need for evidence
A technically-superior solution nobody wants to use is useless.
Can't you have some idea, yet want to validate this with the broader ecosystem? I frequently ask people for their opinion about stuff, even when I have my opinion. Should commissions/governments not do that? Seems like a fantasy to think your government could know everything without asking the population what they think.