logoalt Hacker News

icyfoxlast Friday at 9:23 PM10 repliesview on HN

At the risk of being overly pedantic, topologists would typically classify this as venom.

Venom is inert if digested; it's only a problem if it gets in your blood stream. So arrows that were laced with venom and thereby contaminated meat were actually perfectly safe to eat.

Poison is different. If ingested, inhaled, or absorbed it will kill you.


Replies

skrebbellast Friday at 11:10 PM

We Dutch solve this problem by having a single word for "poison", "venom and "toxin"¹. Everybody still knows what you mean and nobody gets to be pedantic.

¹ and "badly compressed looping animation"

show 4 replies
VanshPatel99last Friday at 9:27 PM

TIL. I always thought that "If it bite you -> you die = venom" and "If you eat, bite, touch -> you die = poison". But your differentiation makes more sense

show 1 reply
throwaway5465yesterday at 8:13 AM

Not overly pedantic at all as it highlights that by using venom the hunters were able to eat what they shot.

hyrixlast Friday at 10:26 PM

These chemicals are derived from plants where even pedants would classify them as poisons.

The genus name Boophone is from the Greek bous = ox, and phontes= killer of, a clear warning that eating the plant can be fatal to livestock.

show 2 replies
Retricyesterday at 2:20 AM

In practice the difference is mostly semantics.

Venom is still almost always poisonous when eaten and poison is harmful when injected. 2-3% as dangerous when eaten vs injected only helps so much.

OptionOfTyesterday at 2:24 AM

But eating a rattlesnake and dying is a bad way of finding out that you have a stomach ulcer.

Gudyesterday at 11:58 AM

Not pedantic, two different.

Thanks for clarifying.

jeltzyesterday at 9:16 AM

I am not a native speaker but I believe you are wrong. It is called poison dart for example. So injected toxins can be both called poisons and venoms.

show 1 reply
smohareyesterday at 4:02 AM

[dead]

NedFlast Friday at 10:42 PM

[dead]