Does anyone else feel like the LLM-tone of this article makes it difficult to understand what's actually important in it? It's not clear to me if the issue is ongoing (like it says) or that it's been resolved by rotating the API key (like it also says). And that's like, the most basic piece of information the article could have in it.
The article mentions two vulnerabilities. One was remediated June 2025. The other has not been remediated.
I hate that every article nowadays has to be judged on whether it's AI or not.
So annoying.
Obviously more than just tone. Based on the lack of structure and wording it's clearly substantially AI written.