logoalt Hacker News

epolanskiyesterday at 12:07 AM2 repliesview on HN

AGI in its standard definition requires matching or surpassing humans on all cognitive tasks, not just in some, especially some where only handful of humans took a stab on.


Replies

pfdietzyesterday at 1:22 AM

Since no human could do that, are we to conclude no human is intelligent?

ACS_Solveryesterday at 1:44 AM

Surely AGI would be matching humans on most tasks. To me, surpassing humans on all cognitive tasks sounds like superintelligence, while AGI "only" need to perform most, but not necessarily all, cognitive tasks at the level of a human highly capable at that task.

show 2 replies