logoalt Hacker News

danglast Saturday at 12:39 AM1 replyview on HN

It may be that there wasn't enough information in your comment for me to read its intent correctly. I thought you were taking a snarky swipe at the other commenter—especially because most people on HN can be presumed to know what a formal proof is.

If that was the case, I apologize for misreading you! If you're interested, I can point you to https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... for past explanations about this type of misunderstanding and how to avoid it in the future.


Replies

perching_aixlast Saturday at 1:09 AM

Thank you, I'll try to keep it in mind. I'll admit that the curtness of my original question was not just you misreading it, but it did (also) come from a place of genuine confusion.

For what it's worth, it's not even that I don't see merit to their points. I'm just unable to trust that they're being genuine, not the least for how they conduct themselves (which I only fault them for so much). This also impacts my ability to reason about their points clearly.

Sadly, I'm not able to pitch any systematic solutions.