alt Hacker NewsI'd expect even more chaos, let an LLM build the features and people vote.
Replies
stavros • yesterday at 9:23 PM
Behold: https://theboard.stavros.io/
oniony • yesterday at 7:19 PM
I honestly thought that this is what it was initially.
I'd expect even more chaos, let an LLM build the features and people vote.
Behold: https://theboard.stavros.io/
I honestly thought that this is what it was initially.
I kind-of want to see an experiment going the other way.
Have a repo that has a committee of AI models deciding what to merge. Inform them of the goals of the project and that they should only allow positive changes but people are allowed to make adversarial PRs.
It can be more active because the committee can meet on demand. Then people and AI's can attempt to bend the project to their wills.