You still intended it for humans. Intent is defined by what one is aiming for, and without knowledge of an alternative, that was your intent.

100% I get that you are OK with it being used by non-human ingestion. And I think many might be OK with that.

One thing, I'm not sure how helpful the documentation is. I think we're getting training out of example, not docs. This makes me think... we could test this by creating a new pseudo-language, and then provide no examples, only docs.

If the LLM can then code effectively after reading the docs, we'd have a successful test. Otherwise? It's all parroting.