logoalt Hacker News

raverbashinglast Sunday at 9:15 PM2 repliesview on HN

It's easy to dismiss the most obvious cases where EvD is wrong

But I think the basic idea, by itself is harder to dismiss

Archeology by itself is always going to have limitations, and there are vast swatches of history we are almost completely ignorant about

EvD is certainly guilty of taking himself much more seriously than the evidence suggests. But there's always going to be that "what if"


Replies

protocoltureyesterday at 5:04 AM

>But I think the basic idea, by itself is harder to dismiss

Its an unproven hypothesis.

It doesnt need to be "dismissed" it needs to be proven. You could make up any number of hypotheses. You wouldnt "dismiss" any of them. If you were interested in one you might design a test to prove it. But failing that its not worth worrying about.

When you write like 49 books trying to convince people of your untested claim, it seems like grifting instead of working towards evidence.

show 2 replies
diego_moitalast Sunday at 11:43 PM

> But I think the basic idea, by itself is harder to dismiss

Speak for yourself. I find it very easy to dismiss.

Just as I find easy to dismiss horoscopes, creationism, anti-vaxers, global warming denialism, etc.

show 2 replies