This is so stupid. You still have to review that code, you still have to know what the solution to something is, ergo, you still need to know how to do it and you still have to deal with the cognitive load from reviewing someone else's code. I don't understand how you can write as if the implementation, fairly trivial and mechanical, is somehow more taxing than reading someone else's code..

This is not the support argument you think it is, it just further allures to the fact that people raving about AI just generate slop and either don't review their code or just send it for their coworkers to review.

I guess AI bros are just the equivalent of script-kiddies, just running shit they don't know how it works and claiming credit for it.