> The deliberate misuse of someone’s image or voice without their consent for malign purposes should be a criminal offence.
So much vagueness in misuse yet so much impact with consequences. This bill is being speedlined. And it seems to hurt everyone at the same time.
Better to bring a bill with specific limitations and prohibitions that is complete with treatment, consequences, prosecutions, and appeals.
Then that bill can be extended to other prohibited actions as they become apparent
Except this is not the text of the bill. You are quoting a comment from a news articles, and commenting upon it as if you were reading a bill.
Have you read the bill or is the quote the only thing you're going on?