logoalt Hacker News

kenjacksonyesterday at 3:51 PM5 repliesview on HN

Somewhat surprising. AI is such a core part of the experience. It feels like a mistake to outsource it to arguably your biggest competitor.


Replies

crazygringoyesterday at 4:15 PM

It's clear they don't have the in-house expertise to do it themselves. They aren't an AI player. So it's not a mistake, just a necessity.

Maybe someday they'll build their own, the way they eventually replaced Google Maps with Apple Maps. But I think they recognize that that will be years away.

show 2 replies
deergomooyesterday at 7:46 PM

> AI is such a core part of the experience

For who? Regular people are quite famously not clamouring for more AI features in software. A Siri that is not so stupendously dumb would be nice, but I doubt it would even be a consideration for the vast majority of people choosing a phone.

show 1 reply
asadotzleryesterday at 9:52 PM

Web search is a core part of browsing and Apple is Google's biggest competitor in browsers. Google is paying Apple about 25x for integrating Google Search in Safari as Apple will be paying Google to integrate Google's LLMs into Siri. If you think depending on your competitor is a problem, you should really look into web search where all the real money is today.

gregoriolyesterday at 3:53 PM

They could use it like Google Search, not as the first thing the user sees, but as a fallback

xtoiletteyesterday at 4:10 PM

How much of the two revenue streams overlap in reality?