logoalt Hacker News

pjc50yesterday at 4:50 PM4 repliesview on HN

This is only going to change if prosecution is brought against Meta itself, which it looks like the "recklessly" clause is intended to imply. I look forward to Meta facing criminal charges for profiting from fraud.

What's the Irish equivalent of Hansard, by the way? Can we look up the debate?


Replies

dmurrayyesterday at 5:49 PM

There hasn't been a debate. The headline is not reflective of the facts. There hasn't been any agreement to fast track this bill, but the politician sponsoring it has said in a radio interview that (surprise!) he thinks it should be fast tracked.

The Dáil record can be found here, but there's nothing of interest in it:

https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/search/?searchType=debates&deba...

show 1 reply
Ajedi32yesterday at 6:06 PM

What makes you think Meta will do a better job of policing this than the actual police?

Granted, they might be able to crack down harder in some respects since unlike the police they don't have to worry about due process, but is that really "doing a better job" on balance?

show 3 replies
ChrisMarshallNYyesterday at 5:23 PM

> facing criminal charges for profiting from fraud

Amazon, too, but this seems to be "fraud that annoys pols," so I guess The Big A is going to be left alone...

verzaliyesterday at 5:58 PM

Oh they won't. Vance will say a few mean words and threaten to bomb Dublin if anyone lifts a finger against Meta.