logoalt Hacker News

Palmiktoday at 11:11 AM6 repliesview on HN

Nothing wrong with a GPL-like viral license for the AI era.

Training on my code / media / other data? No worries, just make sure the weights and other derived artifacts are released under similarly permissive license.


Replies

m4rtinktoday at 1:00 PM

Well, I would say it should be like that already & no new license is needed. Basically if a LLM was ever based on GPL code, its output should be also GPL licensed. As simple as that.

rubymamistoday at 1:51 PM

We need countries to start legally enforce that. Nothing will change otherwise. I stopped open sourcing my code and LLMs are one of the big reason.

breezykoitoday at 11:19 AM

Wouldn't you want the code generated by those models be released under those permissive licenses as well? Is that what you mean by other derived artifacts?

show 1 reply
teekerttoday at 12:29 PM

It really should be like that indeed. Where is RMS? Is he working on GPLv4?

show 3 replies
maelitotoday at 12:53 PM

Interesting. Is there a license that acts this already ?

grumbeltoday at 2:13 PM

That is a complete fools errand. If it ever passes it would just mean the death of Open Source AI models. All the big companies would just continue to collect whatever data they like, license it if necessary or pay the fine if illegal (see Antropic paying $1.5 billion for books). While every Open Source model would be starved for training data within its self enforced rules and easy to be shut down if ever a incorrectly licenses bit slips into the models.

The only way forward is the abolishment of copyright.

show 1 reply