logoalt Hacker News

arghwhatyesterday at 2:39 PM1 replyview on HN

Just to be pedantic: The median construction time is 7 years. With very slow planning, it is a decade, not decades. It can be done faster though.

Our power consumption won't be going down, and it generally wouldn't be the AI company itself running the project but the electricity companies that earn money supplying power that see dollar signs in all that extra electricity consumption.

Even if the AI companies all die, our global electricity consumption will keep going up margins will be better than the retired plants, so it's a good investment regardless.


Replies

hvb2yesterday at 5:02 PM

I think you should look up actual construction times on reactors in developed countries. Be VERY happy if you can do it in less than 15 years.

> Even if the AI companies all die, our global electricity consumption will keep going up margins will be better than the retired plants, so it's a good investment regardless

If the company putting up the money goes bankrupt, what happens to the project? Maybe it's picked up by someone else?

I think AI companies should try to make it to 2030, my guess is at least a few of them won't make it. Don't commit to projects that won't even complete in the 2030s

show 1 reply