logoalt Hacker News

I Love You, Redis, but I'm Leaving You for SolidQueue

83 pointsby amalinovictoday at 9:25 AM33 commentsview on HN

Comments

antireztoday at 10:05 AM

Every time some production environment can be simplified, it is good news in my opinion. The ideal situation with Rails would be if there is a simple way to switch back to Redis, so that you can start simple, and as soon as you hit some fundamental issue with using SolidQueue (mostly scalability, I guess, in environments where the queue is truly stressed -- and you don't want to have a Postgres scalability problem because of your queue), you have a simple upgrade path. But I bet a lot of Rails apps don't have high volumes, and having to maintain two systems can be just more complexity.

show 1 reply
victorbjorklundtoday at 10:30 AM

For people that does not think it scales. A similar implementation in Elixir is Oban. Their benchmark shows a million jobs per minute on a single node (and I am sure it could be increased further with more optimizations). I bet 99,99999% of apps have less than a million background jobs per minute.

https://oban.pro/articles/one-million-jobs-a-minute-with-oba...

show 2 replies
jacob-s-sontoday at 10:41 AM

Every author of the free software obviously has rights to full control of the scope of their project.

That being said, I regret that we have switched from good_job (https://github.com/bensheldon/good_job). The thing is - Basecamp is a MySQL shop and their policy is not to accept RDMS engine specific queries. You can see in their issues in Github that they try to stick "universal" SQL and are personally mostly concerned how it performs in MySQL(https://github.com/rails/solid_queue/issues/567#issuecomment... , https://github.com/rails/solid_queue/issues/508#issuecomment...). They also still have no support for batch jobs: https://github.com/rails/solid_queue/pull/142 .

rajaravivarma_rtoday at 11:00 AM

The one use case where a DB backed queue will fail for sure is when the payload is large. For example, you queue a large JSON payload to be picked up by a worker and process it, then the DB writing overhead itself makes a background worker useless.

I've benchmarked Redis (Sidekiq), Postgres (using GoodJob) and SQLite (SolidQueue), Redis beats everything else for the above usecase.

SolidQueue backed by SQLite may be good when you are just passing around primary keys. I still wonder if you can have a lot of workers polling from the same database and update the queue with the job status. I've done something similar in the past using SQLite for some personal work and it is easy to hit the wall even with 10 or so workers.

show 5 replies
dependency_2xtoday at 10:07 AM

Postgres will eat the world

show 2 replies
KolmogorovComptoday at 11:35 AM

> Job latency under 1ms is critical to your business. This is a real and pressing concern for real-time bidding, high frequency trading (HFT), and other applications in the same ilk.

From TFA. Are there really people using Rails for HFT?

show 1 reply
ashniu123today at 10:07 AM

For Node.js, my startup used to use [Graphile Worker](https://github.com/graphile/worker) which utilised the same "SKIP LOCKED" mechanism under the hood.

We ran into some serious issues in high throughput scenarios (~2k jobs/min currently, and ~5k job/min during peak hours) and switched to Redis+BullMQ and have never looked back ever since. Our bottleneck was Postgres performance.

I wonder if SolidQueue runs into similar issues during high load, high throughput scenarios...

jjgreentoday at 9:56 AM

Nice article, I'm just productionising a Rails 8 app and was wondering whether it was worth switching from SolidQueue (which has given me no stress in dev) to Redis ... maybe not.

ckbkr10today at 11:06 AM

Comparing Redis to SQL is kinda off topic. Sure you can replace the one with the other but then we are talking about completely different concepts aren't we?

When all we are talking about is "good enough" the bar is set at a whole different level.

show 3 replies
reena_signalhqtoday at 9:48 AM

Interesting migration story! I've been using Redis for background jobs for years and it's been solid, but the operational overhead is real.

Curious about your experience with SolidQueue's reliability - have you run into any edge cases or issues with job retries/failures? Redis has been battle-tested for so long that switching always feels risky.

Would love to hear more about your production experience after a few months!

stevieetoday at 11:35 AM

Wearing my Ruby T-Shirt (ok, Rubyconf.TH, but you get the gist) while reading this makes me fully approving and appreciating your post! It totally resonates with my current project setups and my trying to get them as simple as possible.

Especially when building new and unproven applications I'm always looking for things that trade the time I need to set tings up properly with he time I need to BUILD THE ACTUAL PRODUCT. Therefore I really like the recent changes to the Ruby on Rails ecosystem very much.

What we need is a larger user base setting everything up and discovering edge-cases and (!) writing about it (AND notifying the people around Rails). The more experience and knowledge there is, the better the tooling becomes. The happy path needs to become as broad as a road!

Like Kamal, at first only used by 36signals and now used by them and me. :D At least, of course.

Kudos!

Best, Steviee