logoalt Hacker News

CodingJeebusyesterday at 3:21 PM4 repliesview on HN

No, this is absolutely not normal as the article clearly states. Reporters are very rarely raided in the US under circumstances like these.

The problem is that "classified materials" means whatever the government wants it to mean in this context. Is there a journalist you want to target for a particular reason? Just accuse them of handling classified information, which they don't ever have to produce to the public because it's "classified".


Replies

chasd00yesterday at 3:58 PM

Here’s a less sensational article. The journalist is not even a target of the investigation, the target is a contractor leaking documents.

“ Natanson was told that she is not a target of the investigation, a person familiar with the matter told CNN.

Instead, it appears to be related to an ongoing probe of a government contractor in Maryland.”

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/14/media/fbi-hannah-natanson-was...

show 3 replies
notyourworkyesterday at 3:26 PM

Trump keeps that kind of stuff in their guest bathroom, cool. Reporter, raid and straight to jail. What a timeline to witness. Elected officials glut preventing them from doing their duty.

show 1 reply
AlexandrByesterday at 4:32 PM

In some ways this is just desserts after American journalists decided that Julian Assange was not worth defending[1]. Still disheartening to see, since we need robust journalism to keep companies/politicians honest.

[1] https://x.com/washingtonpost/status/1116371239705227265

potato3732842yesterday at 3:27 PM

>, this is absolutely not normal

On what grounds? Just repeating a BS assertion doesn't make it true.

The feds have been abusing journalists like this as long as I've been alive. It's not a lot, it's a trickle of them, maybe one a year or so in recent years. But one raid on one person isn't unprecedented or abnormal in any way. Now if you want to talk about frequency or the minimum size of thorn in side they'll go after it might be a different story. But nobody is saying that.

I might think the behavior is despicable and probably also unlawful, and their "they had classified info" excuse is flimsy BS, but it is unfortunately somewhat normal.

The problem is way, way, way worse, way longer running and way more institutionally entrenched than flabbergastingly moronic "these specific people right here right now did misdeeds" surface level assessment may comfortingly imply.

show 2 replies