logoalt Hacker News

ltayesterday at 6:02 PM10 repliesview on HN

Regardless of the price and the data, I'd never subscribe to this service due to the owner. I'm looking forward for alternatives from a more neutral vendor


Replies

homebreweryesterday at 6:34 PM

I think they will have enough clients from other parts of the world to make it work. Large areas of my country can't really be covered with wired networks, it's too expensive to make it economically feasible without massive government subsidies, for which there's no money.

Starlink has already been used to connect very remote rural schools which previously only had dial-up connectivity (enough to send text email, but not much else).

And nobody here cares about American politics, we have enough of our own problems.

show 3 replies
gordonhartyesterday at 6:36 PM

Would you rather buy from Jeff Bezos or a Chinese state-owned enterprise? Those are your likely options within the next 5-10 years.

show 3 replies
dayyanyesterday at 6:32 PM

Boycott noted, meanwhile, I’ll be enjoying double the roaming data while you wait for that legendary ‘neutral’ competitor to beam down from the heavens.

show 1 reply
o_1yesterday at 6:31 PM

something something, sounds like a bluesky post.

Salgatyesterday at 6:47 PM

I respect your principles, but at the same time, using Starlink for now does encourage other potential competitors to come forth, at which time you could switch.

syntaxingyesterday at 6:19 PM

I’m 100% on the same boat. The only competitor I can see is Amazon Leo. Having options is great but they both suck.

show 1 reply
whimsicalismyesterday at 6:36 PM

thank you for not bidding up the price

ibejoebyesterday at 6:38 PM

See also the "Fuck You Elon" exhibit at this past Burning Man, powered by starlink.

dyauspitryesterday at 6:47 PM

There are two Chinese alternatives being deployed right now. I believe one is called Guowang. As a red blooded American, I would rather go with Guowang over an American Nazi.