logoalt Hacker News

toomuchtodoyesterday at 7:42 PM2 repliesview on HN

I'm curious if plastics embrittlement is a problem with Far-UVC. I recently was putting a large evaporative humidifier [1] through its paces for someone to get my opinion, and a challenge was that you had to clean the water tank that was the foundation of the unit fairly frequently (every few days). I provided feedback to the manufacturer that a far UVC bulb in the tank might be useful for reducing cleaning intervals.

For use cases where the emissions are contained (HVAC, water tanks, etc), I think it's a slam dunk from an electronic antiseptic perspective. UV is somewhat common in water filtration today, but perhaps an improvement is possible if these bulbs last longer than existing UV solutions.

[1] https://levoit.com/collections/humidifiers-diffusers/product...

(I do not recommend the humidifier by the way, simply too much work to keep the water tank and the evaporation panels clean, I recommend an ultrasonic version instead)


Replies

elil17yesterday at 7:56 PM

I do not believe that there is a good understanding of the impact of far-uvc on plastic embrittlement.

show 2 replies
SV_BubbleTimeyesterday at 11:21 PM

Along the same lines… where is the proof that as the unit ages it doesn’t leave the magic 220nm range?

It is complete nonsense to point this at people.

show 1 reply