logoalt Hacker News

nicoyesterday at 8:33 PM4 repliesview on HN

> Don't

Do you mean "Don't give it more autonomy", or "Don't use it to access servers/dbs" ?

I definitely want to be cautious, but I don't think I can go back to doing everything manually either


Replies

bigstrat2003yesterday at 10:31 PM

You have to choose between laziness or having systems that the LLM can't screw up. You can't have both.

hephaes7usyesterday at 10:35 PM

You can have it write code that you review (with whatever level of caution you wish) and then run that on real data/infrastructure.

You get a lot of leverage that way, but it's still better than letting AI use your keys and act with full autonomy on stuff of consequence.

dsr_yesterday at 9:13 PM

Why aren't you using the tools we already have: ansible, salt, chef, puppet, bcfg2, cfengine... every one of which was designed to do systems administration at scale.

show 1 reply
JoshTriplettyesterday at 8:45 PM

I mean, both, but in this case I'm saying "don't use it to access any kind of production resource", with a side order of "don't rely on simple sandboxing (e.g. command patterns) to prevent things like database deletions".