Correct, and there's no way that the private diary of a still-living daughter of a politician was acquired by any method other than theft.
Prosecutors don't need to prove the buyer actually dispositively knew the document was stolen, only that reasonable person would have known it to be such.
Correct, and there's no way that the private diary of a still-living daughter of a politician was acquired by any method other than theft.
Prosecutors don't need to prove the buyer actually dispositively knew the document was stolen, only that reasonable person would have known it to be such.
Which would be obvious in this case.