I was thinking the same thing. No proofreading is a sure sign to me. I also feel like I've read parts of this before.

Some of the images are AI generated (see the Gemini watermark in the bottom right), and the final paragraph also reads extremely AI-generated.

Maybe, but I was trying to find the original source of this article and couldn’t, at least not cursorily.

The table also seems like the kind of thing that Gemini seems to generate a lot. "Here's a table that communicates almost no information! One of the rows is constant for each item."

I already stopped when I saw the AI-gen image