logoalt Hacker News

duskwufftoday at 1:14 AM3 repliesview on HN

Perhaps? But unless tape, and the infrastructure to support it, is dramatically cheaper than disk, they might still be better served by more disk - having two or more copies of data on disk means that both of them can service load, whereas a tape backup is only passively useful as a backup.


Replies

EvanAndersontoday at 12:30 PM

A lot of people, me included, consider anything online not to be backup. Being disconnected and completely at-rest is a very desirable property.

stonogotoday at 6:15 AM

    unless tape, and the infrastructure to support it, is dramatically cheaper than disk, 
This turns out to be the case, with the cost difference growing as the archive size scales. Once you hit petascale, it's not even close. However, most large-scale tape deployments also have disk involved, so it's usually not one or the other.
show 1 reply