logoalt Hacker News

ethagknighttoday at 2:14 PM5 repliesview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

justin66today at 3:43 PM

What examples of digging through that amount of ice for the purposes of mining are you familiar with? What's a good example?

It'd be interesting to understand how much the environment there increases the cost of mining. Anything is possible, but it'd be cool to know whether it makes any sense. (and yes, I think our leadership in the US is fully capable of causing an international crisis over mineral assets that would in financial terms be best left in the ground)

show 1 reply
acdhatoday at 4:17 PM

If “non experts” aren’t welcome, can you establish your expertise on the topic? In particular, what’s your experience with mining thorough ice or maintaining industrial operations in the Arctic or near-arctic conditions?

trashtestertoday at 3:39 PM

The main problem with ice, is that it moves all the time. The glaciers on Iceland move up to 46m per day. Also, any tunnel created in fast moving ice could easily be crushed by the pressure of the ice.

show 2 replies
TitaRuselltoday at 2:56 PM

There is a cost benefit ratio to mining.

I imagine it is a lot easier to just strip mine Australia.

show 1 reply
phatfishtoday at 5:04 PM

I'm glad the resident HN tech bros are also Arctic mining experts. Surely they wouldn't complain about non-experts writing clickbaity articles while making claims with no evidence themselves.