> Designed means exactly that I meant ... designed (meant to) ...

> All of this to show you that my understanding of the work [sic] designed is correct.

All right, I see what's going on here. You just don't know what the word designed means.

To illustrate: if went to the hardware store to buy a claw hammer and meant to use it to murder someone, which you then did, does that mean the claw hammer was "designed" to murder people? No, of course not. The hammer was designed to install and remove nails. It can also be used for other purposes for which it was not meant for, such as murder (as hypothetical you showed), but it was not designed for those purposes.

You're not Humpty Dumpty, words don't mean whatever you choose them to mean. The "defund the police" people thought they could do that, and look where that got us.

If you disagree, find me the design documents for ICE (they're surely public), and show me where it says it's "designed to beat up anyone in the US." Remember that's not going to be a Trump executive order, because time machines aren't real.

> If my comment led you to a conclusion that I support "Defund ICE" you would be correct.

And I guarantee you that even if you do that, some other agency will be tasked with what ICE was designed to do.