This is kind of odd.

Bloom's paradox is well known and proven in education.

AI is the first thing that can positively personalize education and instruction and provide support to instructors.

The authors seem of limited technical literacy to know that you can just train and focus only on textbooks, instead of their explorations using general models and the pitfalls that they have. Not knowing this key difference affects some of the points being made.

The intersection of having a take on technology needs some semblance of digital and technical literacy involved in the paper to help acknowledge or navigate it, or it become a potential blind spot.

It takes legitimate concerns and ironically explores them in average ways, much like an llm returns average text for vague or incomplete questions.