> Refusing the vet AI output is the kiss of death to velocity.

The usual rejoinder I've seen is that AI can just rewrite your whole system when complexity explodes. But I see at least two problems with that.

AI is impressively good at extracting intent from a ball of mud with tons of accidental complexity, and I think we can expect it to continue improving. But when a system has a lot of inherent complexity, and it's poorly specified, the task is harder.

The second is that small, incremental, reversible changes are the most reliable way to evolve a system, and AI doesn't repeal that principle. The more churn, the more bugs — minor and major.