and scientists edit the historical temperatures because of, and i hope you can see my eyeroll here "anomalous readings" - but they're overwhelmingly erroneous in only one direction. that's strange.
Given the amount of noise and normalization , I would like to see that claim better qualified.
That’s what I’m calling attention to. Being more formal with the claims , and transparent about the records origins
Given the amount of noise and normalization , I would like to see that claim better qualified.
That’s what I’m calling attention to. Being more formal with the claims , and transparent about the records origins