alt Hacker NewsI think they’re just saying we should interpret this video in a way that’s consistent with known historical facts. On one hand, it’s not depicting events that are strictly untrue, so we shouldn’t discredit it. On the other hand, since the video itself is literally fake, when we discredit it we shouldn’t accidentally also discredit the events it’s depicting.
Are you saying that if there is 1 instance of a true event, then fake videos done in a similar way as this true event is rational and needed?