alt Hacker NewsKavanaugh literally says that it's well-established that race cannot be a consideration in the application of law.
You (and Kavanaugh a few weeks prior) are saying that it can be.
That's a contradiction.
Kavanaugh literally says that it's well-established that race cannot be a consideration in the application of law.
You (and Kavanaugh a few weeks prior) are saying that it can be.
That's a contradiction.
> [T]he Constitution prohibits selective enforcement of the law based on considerations such as race
> it's well-established that race cannot be a consideration in the application of law.
You seem to think these statements are equivalent. They are not.
"Kavanaugh a few weeks prior" is perfectly consistent, as explained in the other post I linked.