logoalt Hacker News

strogonofftoday at 11:23 AM2 repliesview on HN

Did it not work? Many successful and complex sites and apps use React—whether directly or via a framework (Next, Astro, or something homegrown)—and indeed many frameworks are built on React.

> math tools or pdf generation

In this case the original scope of the library was “reactive rendering”, which sort of makes sense.


Replies

gf000today at 3:50 PM

It worked as in react is the de facto frontend choice.

It didn't work as in if I were to ask for the router, state management, etc library, there would be a combinatorial explosion of react "frameworks", all sucking in different ways.

I am (and supposedly grandparent also) on the option that react leaves out way too much that would still be well in the scope of a 'UI framework', and while modularity can be a good thing in certain things, more modular, more moving parts does increase complexity.

realusernametoday at 11:28 AM

I've been there since the early days of React and I haven't seen a single React codebase which isn't a pile of duck-taped random packages, often leading to poor user performance.

Maybe it can be done, maybe not, but the average front-end dev doesn't have the insights to fill the gaps that React has left.

show 1 reply