[flagged]
> what treachery was committed?
Invading ones allies has been treacherous for millenia. If you want to be pedantic, you can say the U.S. President is openly threatening treachery, and showing as part of his character an affinity for it.
This is about way more than a few tariffs. Think Venezuela, think madman jizzing over the idea of invading greenland, or just throwing tantrums on an international scale.
>> I'm sorry, what treachery was committed? The imposition of import taxes is not treachery.
It is an egregious violation of the Constitution, which specifically says that only Congress can impose taxes.
You must be a proud holder of his cryptocurrency.
Saying “we gotta get Greenland” when the people in Greenland say they don’t want to join the US. Then refusing to rule out using force. If you want to say that no exact act of treachery has been committed, then substitute “treacherous words”, which also harms alliances.