logoalt Hacker News

1970-01-01yesterday at 5:33 PM4 repliesview on HN

I'm interested in any new successful startups going full IPV6 from the beginning. Once we cross that bridge, where your internal IPV4 knowledge is equivalent to token ring knowledge, there's nothing else to watch.


Replies

massysettyesterday at 10:12 PM

Relatedly: wouldn't there be many applications for which ipv4 isn't needed?

For example, Walmart has electronic eink shelf tags they can update remotely. Each one needs a unique address. I wouldn't think it needs ipv4. It doesn't have to connect to the SpaceJam website.

I would think that as time goes by, the number of these new devices would swamp the number of old ones that need ipv4. v4 would still be around and might even seem important to the fogies using web browsers on laptops...meanwhile the street lamp has five ipv6 addresses and no ipv4 ones.

awestrokeyesterday at 6:41 PM

Github still refuses to switch on support for ipv6 traffic for some reason, so you can't interact with github then

speedgooseyesterday at 6:46 PM

It would be a strange and unnecessary risk to take for a startup in my opinion.

show 1 reply
oasisbobyesterday at 8:21 PM

Exclusively IPv6 without any transitional mechanisms would be difficult to succeed with.

However, there are network upstarts like Jio (India) which made huge v6 investments from day one which use 464xlat for subscribers to access v4-only resources.

show 2 replies